优乐|平台

  • Showing posts with label HCM selection. Show all posts
    Showing posts with label HCM selection. Show all posts

    Wednesday, August 28, 2019

    The Use and Misuse of PaaS

    One of the key advantages of modern cloud systems is that they often come with rapid development platforms that allow the vendor, partners, and even customers to build extensions and customizations to the system without affecting the underlying code or architecture of the base system. These are generally known as Platform as a Service (PaaS).

    Examples include the Salesforce Lightning (formerly Force.com) platform, the SuiteCloud platform of Oracle’s NetSuite, Acumatica’s xRP platform, Sage Intacct’s Platform Services, Microsoft’s Power Platform, and many others.

    However, as with so many good things in life, PaaS can be used and abused.

    Read the rest of this post on the Strativa blog:
    The Use and Misuse of Platform as a Service 

    Wednesday, October 18, 2017

    In Vendor Evaluation, Don’t Shortcut the RFI Process

    In some enterprise software selection projects, clients are tempted to skip the Request for Information (RFI) stage and go straight to a Request for Proposal (RFP). This is a mistake and often the result of not fully understanding the value of a well-written RFI.

    What is the difference between an RFI and an RFP? In our software selection consulting services, we develop an RFI near the beginning of the vendor evaluation process. The RFI includes a description of the client’s organization and the client’s project. It also includes a list of key requirements for the new system—not an exhaustive list, but essential functionality or processes that are distinctive for the client. Vendors are asked to respond as to their ability to satisfy those key requirements. Vendors are not asked for a cost proposal at this time. We typically make the RFI available to as many vendors as we think are qualified to respond, or to those that express an interest in responding—usually five or more.

    An RFP, in contrast, is published near the end of the evaluation process, after each finalist vendor (typically 2-3) has conducted its demonstrations or other proof-of-concept. The vendors are asked to provide a cost proposal, along with their proposed license/subscription agreements and a high-level implementation proposal with costs and schedules. The vendors’ RFI responses are incorporated as an attachment, which they can revise based on what they’ve learned since they first responded to the RFI.

    Read the rest of this post on the Strativa blog: In Vendor Evaluation, Don’t Shortcut the RFI Process
  • 真人在线博彩公司大全

    六福彩票官网站

    佰万彩票注册

    雅虎网站首页

    yahu|首页

    www博猫

    福彩世界app下载

    博冠的彩的网登录

    广东体彩手机